Sunday, December 25, 2016

Notable things from 2016

This was a year of many major events for PLAAF and PLAN. This was the year that China came a major or even dominant exporter of UAVs and dramatically expanded its activities in South China Sea with the installation of HQ-9 SAMs. I will look into and review activities from different departments.

This year, PLAN declared that CV-16 is finally combat ready. Throughout much of the year, we saw that the intensity of the flight operations were going up. By the end of the year, CV-16 went on a major exercise where it did much live firing exercises. During this exercise, PLAN went through a much more intensive flight activity with J-15s set up to takeoff in rapid succession. We saw as many as 13 J-15s and 1 Z-18 on board CV-16. The J-15s have been carrying anti-ship missiles as well as anti-air missiles. One of them was even carrying a UPAZ-1A refueling pod. This is the largest air wing we have ever seen on board CV-16. It's hard to say how many more aircraft could even be fit on board CV-16, since Admiral Kuznetsov class has rarely gone with its full complement of aircraft. At this point, at least 21 J-15s that have gone into service by now, so many more could be in the hangar area awaiting takeoff. As this was happening, Type 001A, the first domestically produced carrier, was slowly taking shape in Dalian shipyard. As expected, Type 001A CV-17 looks to be the exact replica of CV-16 in dimensions. CV-17's island is a little smaller than that of CV-16 from what we can see. I also would expect the interior of the carrier to be refined and improved from CV-16. And finally, the CATOBAR variant of J-15 (J-15A) flew for the first time, being powered by WS-10H engines. The 2nd domestic carrier, Type 002, is expected to be a CATOBAR carrier.

As carrier activity heated up this year, more and more blue water surface combatants also joined service. The first Type 055 modules were photographed from JN shipyard this year. They probably won't be launched until 2nd half of next year, so we do not know their exact sizes yet. I wrote an entry previously on how I think Type 055 will look like. Initially, at least 2 Type 055s have been identified at JN shipyard. There has not been any Type 055 modules at Dalian shipyard, but I would expect it to also participate. A new series like Type 055 comes with more risks, so Type 052D construction continues to be very hectic. No. 117, the 5th 052D, was shown in the past month in North Sea Fleet. Basically, we have a full flotilla of 4 052Ds in service with South Sea Fleet and another one that is about to join service. Aside from that, at least 2 more 052Ds are on sea trials and another 4 are fitting out at the shipyards (2 at Dalian and 2 at JN). The 052D production run seems to already have reached more units than I expected (which was 12). A lot of progress was also made among the destroyers going through extensive weapon system upgrades. The lone Type 051B destroyer, No. 167, recently went out for sea trials after long period of time in the shipyard. A lot of progress has also been made in No. 136, the first Sov destroyer. It will be interesting to see the exact upgrades that have been performed over the next year.

Of the remaining surface combatants, the production run for Type 054A appears to be coming to a close. Only 2 Type 054As joined service earlier this year with 2 more ready to join service soon. Both HP and HD shipyard will move to other projects after the current batch is completed. They have both been very active with Type 056 production, as have Wuchang and LiaoNan shipyard. At least 6 Type 056s have already joined service this year. Up to this point, at least 40 of them have at least been launched. About 12 to 13 Type 056s have been identified in both HP and HD shipyard, with another 9+ have been identified in each of the other 2. There may be 60 Type 056s by the end of its production run. There does seem to a lull in the production of larger ships. There were 1 Type 071 LPD, 1 Type 815A AGI and 3 Type 903A AOR joining service in the earlier part of this year, but HD shipyard hasn't launched any other large naval ships recently. PLAN may be moving on from these series of ships to newer classes. The first Type 901 AOR was launched at GSI shipyard and has recently gone on sea trials. It is much larger than Type 903A and far more suited for supplying a carrier group. There is also the rumoured Type 075 LHD class which should be noticed soon. I expect HD shipyard to carry the task of building this series. It remains to be seen if an upgrade Type 071A LPD will also start production. Production of Type 081 minesweeper and Type 082II minehunters also seemed to have drawn to a close.

As I look at PLAN this year, the focus has mainly been on the development of carrier group. A lot of time and effort have been devoted to the construction of new carrier and building up naval aviation fleet. Type 055 and Type 056 series have also enjoyed a lot of attention, but other areas have begun to slow down. It appears that numerous branches of PLAN surface combatants have finished hardware modernization. PLAN is continuing to develop a fleet with more fire power and blue water capability. It should not be surprising that areas like MCM fleet, medium sized AORs, AGI fleet and icebreakers slowing down production after a while. Even PLAN's fleet of frigates have mostly completed modernization now that Type 054/As have taken over all the major flotilla.

While PLAN's marquee project was making significant progress, PLAAF's marquee project J-20 also experienced much progress this year. The first LRIP version of J-20 appeared at the end of last year and made it's maiden flight this year. As the year went on, more photos of LRIP J-20 appeared. They were tested carrying various different missiles, fuel tanks and other ordinances. By the time of Zhuhai Airshow, J-20 made its first public appearance in a fly by. Not much was shown, but that is expected for a fighter jet that has yet to complete all of its flight and weapon testing. By the end of this year, FTTC formed a new 176th brigade for the first 6 J-20s to begin the process of expanding its flight envelope and developing tactics and training programs. The first 2 J-20s were officially handed over this month, but there have already been rumours of DACT between J-20 and 3rd generation fighter jet. Much of the rumours sounded like the early stories of F-22 vs F-15/18, so I will be keeping an eye out for more stories like this in 2017. At this point, it looks like J-20 will achieve IOC in 2017, which is just 6 years after it's first flight and 3 years after the first flight of No. 2011. A whole new series of missiles have been developed for J-20. J-10B/C are already in service with PESA/AESA radar along with a new generation of integrated avionics and combat system. One would imagine J-20 would be much further along, but it's unknown how that would compare to F-35 (often referred to as a flying computer). Either way, the largest question mark left for J-20 is its propulsion. WS-15 is still a couple of years away from design certification. Therefore, the initial J-20s are flying with under powered engines. It may be a while longer before we get details on exactly what kind of engines are powering these early J-20s. The J-31 project appears to have fallen much first behind. There were numerous reports in this year that both PLAAF and PLAN have rejected the current iteration of this aircraft. It looks like SAC is continuing to privately fund this project and recently flew the second prototype. Since J-20 is unlikely to be purchased in large number (probably in similar numbers of F-22), there will be a requirement for a lower cost 5th generation fighter jet. SAC is building a limited number of prototypes to continue to showcase an improved demonstrator. At some point, it is hoping to capture more funding from PLA in order to really ramp up the development work for J-31. It would be a sad day for SAC if it looses both the light 5th gen aircraft and 2nd generation naval aircraft project to CAC.

The other major news in PLAAF this year was the entry into service of Y-20 transport. Two Y-20s were handed over to the first 4th division in June. More Y-20s may have been handed over by the end of the year. Ramping up the production of an aircraft the size of Y-20 is no easy task. Even Airbus and Boeing experience much difficulties in ramping up production level of new aircraft like A350 and B787 while trying to lower the production cost at the same time. I don't think Y-20 production needs to reach that level, but it will be a big challenge for XAC to go from building 1 Y-20 every 2 months to 2 Y-20s every month. The Y-20 platform is badly needed in PLAAF for various missions, so it's critical for XAC to be able to ramp up Y-20 production. Until then, PLAAF is reliant on 3 IL-78s and some H6U for refueling + various Y-8/9s for special mission platform. On the major question of propulsion, I think the initial batch is equipped with WS-18 engine. WS-20 seems to have already done a lot of testing, so it may be ready to equip Y-20 in the near future.

As J-20 captured all of the spotlight this year, J-10C production has continued int he background. After the first batch of 55 J-10B was produced, there probably will be around that many J-10Cs being produced in this second batch. As many as 4 J-10B/C regiments have been formed on top of the J-10B/Cs servicing with 2 different FTTC brigades. Currently, close to 40 J-10s are produced every year. At the same time, the deal for 24 Su-35s with Russia was finally agreed to. The first Su-35 appears to have been delivered in the last couple of days. I know a lot of Chinese military fans are wondering why this was signed. It seems like PLAAF prefers Su-35 over J-11D and wanted another flanker regiment in the air superiority missions in service. Development work for J-11D has continued. It's major improvements over J-11B seems to be all related to electronics, so I don't think it should take too long for this aircraft to join service. Work on J-16 has also continued. A recent photo showed a second batch of J-16s under construction at SAC. Some from the first batch appears to be going through the testing process at FTTC. I have yet to confirm an official J-16 regiment. On the whole, SAC continues to look a step slower than CAC in production and development. It took a good 5 years (2008 to 2013) to go from J-10B's first flight to joining service with PLAAF. It took the same number of years for J-11B to go from first flight in 2002 to joining service with 2007. All of this happened while CAC had to divert precious resources to the J-20 project. More recently, it seems like CAC moved from J-10B to J-10C a lot more smoothly than SAC from J-11B to J-11D. In both cases, the major changes were all related to avionics and combat system. At some point, production version of J-10s will finally move to using WS-10 series of engines. The original WS-10 engines finally achieved production certification this year, which is quite a huge milestone. A couple of J-10Bs were fitted with WS-10B engines at the end of the first batch, but the J-10Cs have continued to be equipped with AL-31FN. The upgraded WS-10G engine, aka WS-10IPE?, supposedly achieved design certification year, so we should be seeing it join service soon. There are some speculations that we will a J-10D variant with this engine and some other upgrades, but that is to be seen. And finally, WS-13E engine achieved design certification this year. The second FC-31 prototype may be powered by this engine. It could also be used to power JF-17 and UCAV projects. So, I think this is one development that should be carefully watched.

In all of the remaining areas, I think the explosion of UAV/UCAV exports this year has been quite fascinating. The CH series have now becomes the AK-47s of drones. Many of the middle Eastern countries have purchased some Chinese UAVs and put them into action. It remains to be seen which of the UAV prototypes tested in CAC and SAC airfields in the recent years will be put into service with PLA. There have also been a lot of movements on both army and naval helicopter forces. Most recently, Z-15 had its maiden flight with WZ-16 engine. This helicopter is expected to make its way into PLA at some point. Z-20 helicopter has been going through a lot of testing and may still be a couple of years away. China had been lacking a non attack helicopter between the 4 and 13 ton class for the longest time. Now, it will have two in a couple of years when both Z-15 and Z-20 are ready. They may not be both needed. Z-10 and Z-19 have continued to proliferate with Army Aviation. A more power attack helicopter is said to be under development. Newer turboshaft (WZ-10 and WZ-16) are now available as part of Z-15 and Z-20 project which could be used to power such an attack helo. Various Z-8 and Z-18 helicopter versions have shown up on CV-16 and Type 071 LPD. They are the mainstays of larger ships. The Kamov and Z-9C series of helicopters are still the work horses of PLAN rotary aviation forces for the destroyers and frigates. At some point, these helicopters will need to be replaced since Z-9Cs are too small whereas Ka-28s are too old.

In many ways, PLAAF have grown in more areas than PLAN this year. Aerospace engine remains an area which holds back most PLAAF projects. The progress of J-20 projects has surprised many people. The Y-20 EIS is also very significant. Z-20 is also very far along in its production testing. After J-20, Z-20 and Y-20 join service, the final major ticket item is the H-20 bomber project. Can China go from a bomb truck like H-6K to a subsonic fly wing design similar to B-2. Of all the major ticket items, this appears to be the most challenging of all.

13 comments:

John Lee said...

Thanks for the post Feng, It is interesting that the second prototype of the J-31 went by their export designation FC-31, which certainly corroborates the stories about PLA rejecting this design. I think if SAC can get a decent design going, Pakistan would certainly be interested, since they don't have any viable 5th generation option otherwise. They were brandying the $70 mil figure for this plane.

BTW, do you have any numbers to show how much the J10C and J20 cost? Based on what I can gather from internet sources, the J-10C cost more than an F-16 and the J-20 cost about the same as an F-22 ($110 mil versus $150 mil). Given the low wages in China, they should have a big advantage in cost, but this does not seems to bear out in these sources.

Thanks

Feng said...

I call it J-31, but it really has not received a PLA designation yet. I cannot fathom J-10C being more than $35 million each or J-20 being more than $90 million, especially with the CNY depreciating these days. So basically, there is no way they are more expensive than F-16 or F-22

John Lee said...

According to Wikipedia, F-16 block D cost $19 mil in 1998. Later when some state of the art ones were sold to the Saudis, they cost $110 mil. This might be a more comparable plane to the J-10C. We don't know how much of the $110 mil was actually cost and how much was profit for General Dynamics. Given that an F-35 only cost $150 mil per copy and an F-22 was less than $200 mil each, this seems pretty steep, but is in line with the likes of Euro-fighter or Rafale. Given that India paid over $200 mil per copy for the Rafale, one wonders how much of this is actual cost and how much went to the pockets of various companies.

Jack z said...

What do you mean when you said ". It would be a sad day for SAC if it looses both the light 5th gen aircraft and 2nd generation naval aircraft project to CAC."

I understand the 5th gen refer to F-31, but what about the 2nd gen naval aircraft? As far as I know, J-15 is the only one Chinese Navy have, there isn't a 2nd one even in the drawing board by CAC.

Also for air superiority purposes, I don't see Su-35 have any advantage over J-11D, J-11D has better radar, all indigenous weapons support and many others, maybe Su-35 have advantage in engine, maneuverability and mature production status? But this does not justify purchase from Russia, I see this decision more of political consideration than anything else, how else can Russia reduce its trade deficit with China when oil price is so low? But what do you think?

John Lee said...

@Jack Z,

I agree that a handful of Su35 adds only marginally to the Chinese capability while adding a lot of headaches for maintenance. While political considerations are there, there may still be a number of reasons why the Chinese want to add this to their arsenal.

1. This allowed the Chinese a peek inside the latest technology from Russia. While the Chinese have mostly caught up in many areas, there will always be some area where they can benefit when both countries develop technologies independently.

2. A powerful, agile aircraft could help the Chinese develop tactics against F-22, which is similarly agile. I am pretty sure they can find a way to turn down the radar to simulate this using a su-35.

3. The spare engines could fill a gap while the Chinese ramp up their production. Based on this post and others, even now, they are not able to produce enough of the WS-10 to supply the J-10C with it. Though I heard that the Russians are dragging their feet on the supply of the spare engines.

Feng said...

there is definitely a next generation naval fighter competition held at some point. CAC is probably offering a naval version of J-20.

PLAAF obviously thinks that Su-35 has various advantages over domestic flankers and it has proven in the past that it can incorporate domestic radar and weapon system onto Russian flankers. This is a PLAAF decision. Not a political decision.

Jack z said...

Ok thanks, you do a very good analysis on aircraft and surface ships, I just wonder can you do a future blog on Chinese navy submarines? I know this is not as exciting as surface warships, but I think in the event of war, it will proven much more useful than anything else.

And yes I know data on submarines are hard to come by, but do what you can please.

John Lee said...

Feng,

If the PLA had intended to field the SU-35 as part of their air force, they would have gotten more than the one squadron strength. given the trouble with maintenance of a new air frame. At the cost of $80 mil a copy, you are almost there with J-20. I don't think, as powerful and maneuverable as the SU-35 is, that it can legitimately compete with a true fifth gen fighter like the J-20 with the proper engine. I think that the Chinese, with their bottleneck being the engine, will not likely try to clone the SU-35 like they did the previous flankers. If they can produce enough engines of this type, they would probably go straight to the fifth generation plane given the similar cost of the two. Even if the Chinese can do a copy at half the cost of the J-20, in actual combat, the J-20 can probably beat the SU-35 by more than 2:1.

I think that this is more of a technology harvest than fielding the actual plane as part of the force.

Feng said...

The overriding reason is Su-35's capability rather than technology harvest. Su-35 has resolved certain issues with turn rates at transonic speed, but I'm not sure if they will be able to or even need to put similar changes on J-11 series. There is just not that much technology left for China to study. As for submarines, it's a little harder to do, since we don't get that much information on the latest nuclear subs. I have written numerous entries on them. I don't think anything has changed since my last entry.

Christian Brotherhood said...

Why can PLAN go straight to steam catapult aircraft carrier as they had studied the technology since 1980s? I know they are cautious but just copying Soviet design with minor modification is pretty lame to me. What do you think?

John Lee said...

There is a lot that they need to ramp up on just to do the copying. The Chinese ship yards probably never did a ship of this type and size. Everything from metallurgy to power plants are new. Plus even if you did some studies with steam catapults, you need to really study in depth about how the thing would fail before feeling comfortable installing one, since a failure will likely mean a lost of ship and possibly life. Given all the other ships that must come together to form a carrier group and the training that still needs to happen, they are not delaying the final outcome much by first building a ship with the Soviet design. This whole thing will probably take 20 years to complete.

Feng said...

It's a big jump to go straight to catobar carrier. They might go straight to EMAL and skip steam catapult which I think is quite aggressive. It's not easy building a brand new carrier and they are building one up from scratch for the firm time with CV-17.

pak irwan di jayapura said...


Saya sekeluarga ingin mengucapkan banyak terima kasih kepada MBAH BUDI HARTONO,atas bantuannya saya yang dulunya cuma seorang tukan becak yang pendapatannya tidak seberapa,buat biaya anak sekolah aja susah,apalagi untuk mencukupi kebutuhan hidup keluarga saya,suatu hari saya tidak sengaja mendengar pembicaraan teman saya mengenai angka togel ghaib dari MBAH BUDI HARTONO,akhirnya saya bertanya dan teman saya memberikan nomor hp MBAH BUDI HARTONO,dan saya pun menghubunginya,berkat bantuan MBAH yang telah memberikan angka ghaib hasil ritualnya yaitu 4d putaran SGP,dan alhamdulillah berhasil,kini kehidupan saya sudah jauh lebih baik dari sebelumnya,dan sekarang saya juga sudah buka usaha sendiri,saya sangat bersyukur melihat anak saya sudah bisa lanjut sekolah,itu semua atas bantuan MBAH BUDI HARTONO,bagi anda yang penggemar togel mau menang seperti saya silahkan hubungi 085-256-077-899 atau KLIK DISINI